Public sentiment showcases polarization regarding India's diplomatic approach at the SCO meeting. Many express pride in Rajnath Singh's decision to refuse signing a joint statement perceived as unfavorable, highlighting nationalist sentiments. However, a significant number of comments reflect skepticism and concern over potential diplomatic isolation, particularly regarding relations with China and Pakistan. This mixture results in overall cautious optimism but reveals deep concerns regarding India's international position.

India

China

Pakistan

China once again tried to sneak in language that downplays Pakistan’s role in cross-border terrorism at the SCO summit — and, as expected, backed Pakistan diplomatically. But India wasn’t having it. Refused to sign the joint statement because it didn’t mention the Pahalgam terror attack or hold anyone accountable. Honestly, it’s refreshing to see India take such a clear stand. No more bending over for “consensus.” We’re finally seeing a leadership that can hold its ground against pressure from both China and Pakistan. Can’t imagine the older governments doing the same.

Hairy-Anything-9384

wow, so much delusion in this post. mate india diplomacy use to be so fucking good during manmohan times. BJP is running india image and making us isolated in the entire world, what are you even on about?

deshbhak7

Also shows India’s weak diplomatic standing in the world, both eastern add western alliances.

outrageous2121

Then why even waste time attending the sco, we all know it's a Chinese dominated organization. Like was our beloved rajnath Singh really craving for a sightseeing tour and free lunch like munir from Pakistan.

alv0694

India is sadly a naked snake charmer who got blinded in both its brics eye and trump daddy eye. So much for non aligned.  No friends mean ready to be invaded like so many times before, enemies see this moment of weakness.

scalper0402


* Please provide a source to the image/video below the comment. If source is not provided then the post will be removed.

* Use the same title as that of the source link. Editorialised titles are not allowed

* If it is Original Content (video/pic taken by you) then please respond with OC below the comment

* If it's meme/satire, please use the meme/cartoon flair and provide the link to the original creator. Memes will be allowed as per mod discretion and can be removed without explanation.

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedstatesofindia) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Gopu_17

Good decision, that's precisely why we are in the SCO to prevent these kind of joint statements.

mactavish6_9

Aren't these statements circulated internally to all prior to publication? Wasn't this omission spotted at that stage?

Affectionate-Ball-35

India has degraded the ties with SCO since the ladakh clash. Our prime minister no longer going, some minister or some bureacrat goes to their summits

Critifin

Backwaterbuddha

***Shanghai*** *Cooperation Organisation* \- What were they expecting? Garland of flowers and appreciation to neighboring member (India) who joined 9 June 2017. Irony Modi's first term (India's requested to join on 10 June 2015)

RawLikeYouWantIt

SS: 
Summary: China’s Panchen Lama Pledges Loyalty to Xi Jinping and Communist Party

On June 6, 2025, China’s state media reported a rare meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Gyaltsen Norbu, the Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama—considered the second most important figure in Tibetan Buddhism. Norbu, who was controversially selected by Beijing in 1995, pledged full loyalty to the Communist Party, vowing to support national unity and promote the sinicization of religion, which aims to align all religions, including Buddhism, with Communist Party ideology.

The meeting highlighted China's ongoing efforts to control Tibetan Buddhism, especially since the Panchen Lama plays a key role in recognizing the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, who fled to India in 1959 after a failed uprising and remains in exile. The Dalai Lama's own chosen Panchen Lama, Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, disappeared shortly after being named in 1995—allegedly abducted by Chinese authorities. Beijing claims he now lives a private life, but has provided no evidence.

Xi urged the state-appointed Panchen Lama to modernize Tibet and reinforce loyalty among Tibetans. This move comes amid China’s broader push to tighten control over minority regions and manage domestic unrest during an economic downturn.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently called for Gedhun’s release and condemned China’s suppression of Tibetan religious freedom. The incident underscores the ongoing religious and cultural tensions in Tibet, and China’s determination to dominate succession in Tibetan spiritual leadership.


---

India's Perspective:

India continues to host the exiled Dalai Lama and the Tibetan government-in-exile in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, and maintains a long-standing position of supporting Tibetan cultural and religious freedom, while officially recognizing Tibet as part of China. However, developments like this reinforce India’s strategic concerns about China’s tightening grip on Tibet—a region bordering several Indian states.

India remains cautious, seeing China's control over Tibetan Buddhism not only as a threat to religious freedom, but also as part of a broader geopolitical and security challenge in the Himalayan region. The succession issue of the Dalai Lama is especially sensitive for India, as it may influence future cross-border dynamics, impact Tibetan refugees, and affect India-China relations, which are already strained following military tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

BROWN-MUNDA_

The CCP exerts control on all religions. 

---

The CCP itself is officially atheist, and its members are prohibited from holding religious beliefs.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) implements a policy of 'Sinicization' to control major religions, ensuring they align with socialist values and the Party's ideology. This involves:

  - Christianity: The CCP controls the Three-Self Patriotic Movement and the Chinese Christian Council, appointing bishops and overseeing doctrine. They also promote Xi Jinping's thought in Christian media.
  - Islam: The CCP reinterprets the Quran, promotes 'Chinese characteristics' in Islamic practice, and suppresses unauthorized content. Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang face intense surveillance and forced assimilation.
  - Buddhism: The CCP enforces laws to control Tibetan Buddhism, integrating political directives into religious administration. They also co-opt historical figures to strengthen ideological control.
  - Taoism: The CCP uses the Chinese Taoist Association to supervise Taoism, controlling doctrine and personnel. They promote 'strict governance' to control clergy and sermons.

There have been numerous reports, particularly from the central province of Henan, where churches have been forced to remove displays of the Ten Commandments and replace them with quotes from President Xi Jinping.

 * Altering the First Commandment: The first commandment, "You shall have no other gods before me," is often a target. Reports indicate it has been replaced with slogans like "Resolutely guard against the infiltration of Western ideology," or removed entirely, reflecting the CCP's insistence on the Party's ultimate authority.

The CCP is engaged in a 10-year project to rewrite the Bible, Quran, and other religious texts to ensure they align with "socialist characteristics." This includes altering stories to promote CCP narratives, even if it contradicts the original religious text (e.g., a rewritten version of the Gospel of John where Jesus stones the adulterous woman to death).

While five religions are officially recognized, the CCP tightly monitors both registered and unregistered religious groups. Churches that do not comply with these directives face closure and persecution.

Essentially, the CCP's actions are not about theological revisions, but about subordinating religious beliefs and practices to state control and ensuring that religious expression supports the Party's political agenda.

MaffeoPolo



🔗 **Bypass paywalls**:

* [timesofindia.indiatimes.com](https://archive.is/submit/?submitid=&amp;url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-distances-itself-from-sco-statement-condemning-israeli-strikes-on-iran-we-did-not-participate-in-the-discussions-says-mea/articleshow/121848870.cms)

📣 **[Submission Statement by OP](/r/GeopoliticsIndia/comments/1lbd4mo/india_distances_itself_from_sco_statement/mxrlb8w/)**:
&gt; SS: Summary: India Distances Itself from SCO Statement on Israel-Iran Conflict
&gt;
&gt;On June 14, 2025, India clarified that it did not participate in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) discussions that led to the group's condemnation of Israeli airstrikes on Iran. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stated that India's stance on the Israel-Iran tensions remains independent, emphasizing restraint, dialogue, and diplomacy.
&gt;
&gt;India reiterated its position, first outlined on June 13, urging de-escalation and peaceful engagement. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar also conveyed India's concerns in a conversation with his Iranian counterpart, calling for a return to diplomatic channels.
&gt;
&gt;While the SCO strongly denounced Israel’s strikes as violations of international law, India chose not to align with the statement, citing its friendly ties with both Israel and Iran. Indian missions in both countries remain in touch with nationals, advising caution. 

**📜 Community Reminder**: Let’s keep our discussions civil, respectful, and on-topic. Abide by the subreddit rules. Rule-violating comments will be removed.



**📰 Media Bias fact Check Rating :**  Times of India – Bias and Credibility 




|Metric|Rating|
|:-|:-|
|Bias Rating|right-center|
|Factual Rating| mixed|
|Credibility Rating|medium credibility|

This rating was provided by Media Bias Fact Check. For more information, see Times of India – Bias and Credibility's review 
[here](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-india/).
***

❓ Questions or concerns? [Contact our moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/GeopoliticsIndia).

GeoIndModBot

SS: Summary: India Distances Itself from SCO Statement on Israel-Iran Conflict

On June 14, 2025, India clarified that it did not participate in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) discussions that led to the group's condemnation of Israeli airstrikes on Iran. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stated that India's stance on the Israel-Iran tensions remains independent, emphasizing restraint, dialogue, and diplomacy.

India reiterated its position, first outlined on June 13, urging de-escalation and peaceful engagement. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar also conveyed India's concerns in a conversation with his Iranian counterpart, calling for a return to diplomatic channels.

While the SCO strongly denounced Israel’s strikes as violations of international law, India chose not to align with the statement, citing its friendly ties with both Israel and Iran. Indian missions in both countries remain in touch with nationals, advising caution.

Good. We need Israel yes but Iran is also important and alienating it would be a bad idea

Completegibberishyes

This war is going to cause a lot of harm for conutries getting involved economically, diplomatically and strategically. India has to maintain a neutral stance as far as possible. If Iran is attacked by US pakistan, russia and china will be drawn into this war directly or indirectly. Right now India cannot afford to lose diplomatically to any country given its growth trajectory. This a good move from India.

Kindly_Tree_1330

India's Defence Minister met with China's Defence Minister at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, discussing a roadmap for resolving border disputes while tensions over terrorism remain high.

India-China Relations and SCO Meeting

Why This Matters

Public Sentiment Summary

Highlighted Comments

Parties Involved

What the people want